This article strongly criticizes the 'February 28 Incident' in Taiwan and the 'Peace Memorial Day' and 'Peace Memorial Monument' established for it. We believe the 228 incident was an 'internal rebellion,' and it's a 'fake Peace Memorial Day' with 'CCP spies' and 'Japanese Kōmin' causing trouble behind the scenes. We point out the absurdity of its definition of peace and draw an analogy with Japan's post-war attitude towards war.
This article presents a strong 'anti-victimhood narrative' perspective on the US bombing of Kaohsiung in late WWII. We question Taiwanese people's fundraising for a board game called 'Kaohsiung Great Air Raid,' arguing it represents sympathy for defeated Japanese colonizers, and contend that the air raids were justified military strikes against Japanese military installations, with casualties being primarily Japanese soldiers or collaborating imperial subjects.
This article likens Cross-Strait relations to the domestic conflict of 'brothers quarreling within the home' (internal strife) in Chinese society, suggesting that the friction itself proves a shared lineage. The author describes Mainland China as a hardworking previous generation, while casting Taiwan Province as a spoiled, entitled 'child of heaven' who has lost the drive to improve. The piece specifically critiques advocates of Taiwan Independence (Great Taiwan Chauvinists) as the 'youngest spoiled sons' of the family, characterized by high self-esteem but low actual capability, combined with selfishness and a willful nature.
With a sharp satirical tone, this article questions the behavior of Taiwan independence advocates who travel to Mainland China to publicly criticize the CCP, only to cry 'unfair' when they are arrested according to local laws. By listing various international and religious taboos (such as the King of Thailand, North Korea, and Allah), the author highlights the absurdity of such 'trespassing' provocations, questioning whether this is a form of 'selective cheap justice' or an intentional act of bullying designed to create political incidents. The piece concludes by questioning whether the real goal is to save lives or simply to perform a political drama.